
IViL 2007-08: A Review…
Last year was an eventful year and it wouldn’t be a waste of time to look back and draw some conclusions and learn a bit…
What ever I write is usually biased, at least my team-mates feel so. I have tried my best to stay neutral this time! Following here is IViL in the opinion, on the major issues, of three different people – a member, a critic and an outsider.
MEMBER
Overall – IViL has by far had the best year (esp. Jan – Apr, 2008 ) after it was started. There have been exceptional contributions from its members. Be it from the older members like Satheesh or the newly joined Swathi, everyone has done their bit to take things forward. Great progress has also been made in understanding each others’ interests. Many people who have joined IViL are quite content with the way things are going on. Among the newer members I would like to mention the commendable efforts Swapnil, Mrudula, Anusha, Alok, Swathi, Latha… and the list goes on.
Projects – Innumerable projects have been discussed and a good number of them have been taken up for implementation. Few of the unfinished and deserted tasks have also been resumed. For the first time IViL in the form of the RuTAG team has got some people to take up RuTAG projects during the summer. Participation in GENESIS was also a great effort. IGNITED MINDS was also conducted in a couple of schools, this is something special for the initiator (myself). Other events of special importance include the cycle donation programme, Saarang stall (it made the highest profit ever), students visit to IIT etc. The Documentation Team also came up with some decent work. The College team has approached few colleges and have been successful in attracting few people from varied academic backgrounds.
Team – The team has moulded itself into a very effective one. The efficiency has improved enormously and the team members have found their interests and have taken the responsibility for taking the group forward. There are plans for formalising the structure within the group which would help in increasing the ‘efficiency’ of the group. The hunt for new members has always been on. Things just didn’t stop there…
CRITIC
Overall – The team hasn’t left much space here for my comments with their contirubtions. But I do have a few points to make. If the time frame is closely looked at, IViL has produced most of its work in between Jan 5 and Feb 10, 2008. I don’t think is a healthy sign. The activities should be more evenly distributed across the year. Though lots of new members have found their way into the group, few of them were also lost. The team should keep track of such members.
Projects – Though a good number of projects have been started, we don’t seem to have great confidence in our own ventures. Every meeting turned out to be a new starting point and there was a massive restructuring of our plans. Every new experience should just be made an add-on but it shouldn’t move the very foundations of our plans. This point strongly holds good in the case of GENESIS also. Nothing was at stake for the competition, I dont think it was justified to give it so much importance. The worst part was the team abandoning the idea of IKC. The cycle donation activity and the Saarang stall were good projects but they are not the ones we should be giving prime importance to them. The Documentation Team took off really well but the enthusiasm couldn’t be sustained for long. The College Team should plan their moves carefully as we ourselves are not very sure of the future activites.
Team – The team has sometimes failed to value minority opinions. The line of thought of the team shouldn’t be one sided and we should be open to all sorts of opinions. The team also suffered from lack of creativity at times… something has to done immediately to overcome this! Team members taking responsibilities is always a good sign but they should take care that they don’t make decisions for the other members. I have always gone against the structure and I will stand by my opinion. I feel it is not in the best interest of the group. So many new members are being taken in and I am not sure about how prepared we are to take them into the group.
OUTSIDER
Overall – IViL has always been a dormant group. I dont believe much change can be brought about regarding its public face. The group should be more content with their achievements and the others will follow. It is really impressive to see the progress it has made from the almost ‘dead’ stage. New people should come in and take the legacy forward. It is not only time for progress, it should also bring in change.
Projects – The list of projects is great and they also far-reaching. But being in a technical institute the group should be looking more at the technical aspects of rural problems. Saarang and cycle donation are definitely an achievement but there is always something more that is expected from us. We should live up to those expectations. GENESIS…?? How is it related to IViL? It is true that they can’t be put together but it is one more step closer to implementation of the Spirulina plan. We should have gone ahead with the IKC plan, how justified is it to believe that it is not feasible when we actually want to implement it at any cost. The other activities definitely ask for an appreciation… just keep doing them!
Team – The structure is definitely a good move and will help in the longer run. With so many people passing out of group, it becomes a responsibility of the younger members to take things forward. More and more new members should be pulled into the group and the range of activities can also be expanded.
All the best
praveen